Healing Life’s Hurts…

Filed under:Dharma talks — posted by Dharmacharya Gurudas Sunyatananda on Friday, 28th March 2008 @ 8:47 am

We frequently talk about the need to release our minds from the trap of dualistic-thought, and about realising that pain is a natural part of life, while suffering is optional; but when it comes down to the practical, day-to-day experiences that challenge us — especially the ones that cause us pain — it can be difficult to stay mindful of these simple truths.

When, for example, a spouse discovers that their partner has violated the trust of that relationship, our culturally and socially engendered response is to focus our energies on blaming the other person for causing us to suffer. This is complicated in the moment, because our mind intertwines and entangles layers of issues into one “rope” that ensnares us.

For example, we recognise that there was been a violation of trust and an act of infidelity. We recognise that our partner caused us pain. Those are valid and rational recognitions. But they become complicated by the illusive belief that any of this had anything to do with us, and that we are suffering “because of” him or her. We might even blame the “other woman” or “other man” for our suffering. These thoughts are not useful and are delusions.

Every experience we have begins in our minds. In fact, it could be suggested that those experiences only exist in our minds, and no where else, but that, for the purpose of this discussion, is going a little too deep, a little too fast. Our experiences are based on our perceptions, our expectations, our beliefs, and our attachments.

Chances are that right now, either on your key ring, or perhaps in a drawer in your desk, your kitchen or some other place in your home, there are several keys whose purpose you are not quite certain about. I remember a few years back, when my nephew (now eighteen) was around ten or eleven. I was taking him to an amusement park, during his summer holiday, and as we were driving there, he looked at my keys, and said, “Wow! Do you really have that many doors that lock in your house?”

I laughed, and told him that I actually couldn’t remember what most of those keys were for, but was afraid to throw them away, in case one day I would remember! Sound familiar?

As I sat in grateful meditation that night, it occurred to me that my nephew taught me an incredible spiritual lesson that day. Keys are often used as metaphors in spiritual texts, which are said to be able to “unlock the wisdom” of Enlightenment, healing or understanding. But some keys are just attachments.

That night, I got rid of ten keys on my keychain, and eight to ten years later, I have still not found one instance in which any of those keys turned out to be the key to something I “needed”.

In our example of the “broken relationship”, chances are that we’ve deluded ourselves to believe that our happiness depended on that person. Chances too, are that we have wondered how he or she could do that “to us”. But in reality, the person engaged in the unwholesome practice of violating someone’s trust is harming only themselves. Their actions may be perceived as being painful, but we have to take responsibility for how we choose to deal with that pain. We could allow it to spiral us into depression, or we can allow it to motivate us toward growth and awareness that we only hurt, because we allowed our happiness to depend on impermanent phenomena, and then acted surprised when the phenomenon reached its natural end… as all phenomena do.

In times like these, sitting quietly in meditation, we can “unbraid” the ropes our emotions have created, and then turn our awareness to each individual strand, noticing it as it truly is, and letting it go. If a strand is a strand that causes us pain, we can “be with the pain” and let it wash over us, before releasing it, since it is not helpful to hold onto such experiences. If the emotion is anger, we can allow that emotion to wash over us, and then recognise that it is unuseful as well, and let it go.

Recently, I was berated by a man who grew up in a Third World country, who said that he resented my statement that whatever is not love is fear, because hungry children didn’t create their hunger by lack of love. The poor fellow imagined that I said fear was the absence of food! He clearly had more issues than National Geographic

Archeological Find Challenges Roman Catholic Mythos

Filed under:Dharma talks — posted by Dharmacharya Gurudas Sunyatananda on Wednesday, 26th March 2008 @ 8:06 pm

Monday evening, Great Britain’s Channel 4 aired a compelling documentary, entitled, “The Secrets of the Twelve Disciples”, revealing the discovery of an ossuary in Jerusalem, bearing the name Shimon bar Jonah, the Hebrew name for the disciple known as Peter, in the biblical narratives.

The documentary calls into question the 1939 “secret dig” that was supposed to have occurred at the Vatican, in which the Roman Catholic Church claimed to have discovered “evidence” that the so-called “first pope” was martyred in Rome, and buried there. Of course, such a “find” is essential to keeping the institutional deception alive, that any of the original followers of the Essene dharma teacher, Yeshua ben Josef were ever part of the institutional church.

The ossuary in Jerusalem was found in close proximity to the house known to be the home of Simon-Peter’s mother-in-law, which was used for many years as a meeting place for the followers of the Great Teacher, both during his life, and after his death.

Roman Catholics believe the “proof” that Rabbi Jesus made St Peter head of “His Church” is found in the biblical text attributed to Matthew 16:17-19. Even for those who imagine the biblical narratives are something other than religious fiction, this claim is on shakey ground, but not in the eyes of the Roman seat of power. They claim the office of pope was solemnly promised to the apostle as Jesus addresses him: “Blessed art thou, Shimon bar Jonah: because flesh and blood hath not revealed it to thee, but my Father who is in heaven. And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven.”

Of course, there is no historical evidence that Rabbi Jesus, who did not die until many years later in Kashmir, ever intended to start a new religion. Neither is there any evidence in the careful documentation by the Roman secular histories that Shimon bar Jonah was ever martyred on the site of the once famous pagan amphitheatre, marked by the phallic symbol claimed to be the spot of Peter’s martyrdom, in the central court of St. Peter’s Square.

But then, there are no records of the Roman authorities ever trying the man Yeshua be Josef, or of the imaginary “slaughter of holy innocents” by Herod either… and that hasn’t stopped the gulible from believing what they are told to believe.

Dr Robert Beckford, a theologian at Oxford Brookes University, who presents the documentary, denied that this was an attempt to attack the Catholic Church. “This is about looking at what the pillars of power are founded on and examining the scholarship that most Catholics take for granted,” he said, “If you undermine its basis for power you undermine the Church. It’s tragic that the faith gets reduced to manipulating the facts and to one Church trying to make itself superior to others.”

Is it really so difficult to imagine the imperial dynasty, which disguised itself as a “church” guilty of having fabricated a connection between a disciple of the Essene dharma teacher and rabbi, in order to validate its obscene claim to “papal supremacy”? This is, after all, the very same institution that fabricated the story that the seventy-some arbitrarily selected texts of mythos and reflection canonised into a single codex, at the behest of Emperor Constantine was somehow “written by its god”.

Things that make y’go, “Hmmmmmm…”

Copyright

Being Present

Filed under:Dharma talks — posted by Dharmacharya Gurudas Sunyatananda on Tuesday, 25th March 2008 @ 6:23 pm

It doesn’t really matter what happened to disrupt our lives when we were younger, or last year, or last week, or yesterday… or five minutes ago. One of the greatest lessons we can learn in this life is one of letting go.

Sometimes, this lesson is framed as “forgiveness”, but I hesitate to use that word, because it is often associated with an unhealthy perception that forgiveness is something we do for someone that hurt us. This approach is couched in dualistic thought, and is therefore not very useful. True reconciliation occurs when we realise that there is no “other”, no “enemy”, and therefore, no need to “forgive”… simply a need to “let go”.

One of the reasons we hang onto past hurts is because we imagine that the past defines us. We identify ourselves with the cloud of causes and conditions that make up the ego, when that is not an accurate identity at all.

We also fear what others might think, if we appear to be unperturbed by past events; or we might fear what we will lose by moving on.

When two of the places I turned to for monastic shelter failed to respond recently — one actually suggesting that I rent an apartment across the street from them and give them membership dues for the “privilege” of being associated with them (!) — I was disappointed. My initial reaction was to observe that my trust was misplaced, and to realise my suspicions about these institutions were well-founded. Of course they were! So why should I be disappointed in anyone other than myself?

Even at that, why be disappointed in myself, when it was clear that I’d learned what I was supposed to learn in the situation, and now it was time to “shake the dust from my sandals” and move on?

I find that in my own life, whenever emotional attachments remain, it’s because there is some unresolved bit of business yet to be accomplished. And that was the case with this situation.

You see, with one of the institutions, a Catholic monastery near my hermitage, I had to let go of the need to explain why I disassociated myself with institutional religion. And the only way to do that was to explain to the only two people for whom that explanation mattered — my parents. I felt the need to help them become comfortable with the reasons I felt exile was a better and more authentic path for me spiritually. So I did just that.

The other institution was one in which an unhealthy and complex relationship existed. It was a relationship with an institution built on coercion, manipulation, deception and control, whose leader is emotionally, spiritually and psychologically bankrupt and wounded… an institution which attempted to force my sister at gunpoint to join them in 1979, and which exploits the appearance of helping LGBT people and more specifically, people with AIDS, for the purposes of lining its pockets, and bolstering the ego of its leader.

And for fifteen years now, I have attempted to balance separating the benefits this group brings to people from the potential harm it brings to others. And I had to recognise that unlike some of its more vitriolic detractors, my concern was different… I didn’t and don’t see the leader as being “evil”, but rather recognise a broken, needy, ego-centric individual, who struggles with the real desire to help others, while battling the unquenchable hunger for attention, recognition, power and wealth. I recognise extreme pain in that person’s life, both physical and emotional, and feel nothing but compassion for them. Likewise, unlike some of their detractors, I don’t see those involved in that institution as being “stupid”, because I love them as well. No one is involved because they want to be mislead, and all of them are either broken and seeking wholeness, or have discovered healing and want to give back.

I don’t see the leader and members of that organisation as being “them”… nor do I see the members of that Catholic monastery as a “them”. For that matter, I find it impossible to see anyone as being “them” anymore.

So circumstances and conditions disappoint me. Past events disappoint me. But they have no power, when we are present to the moment.

Whatever it is that has happened to you in the past is gone. All that remains of it is what you have created in your mind. There is no power, no lingering effect, no control or harm that yesterday can ever have on you today. There are the lingering imprints or energetic effects of the causes and conditions of the past, which we call karma, but not one of us is powerless to change the impact those karmic imprints have. Each of us can transform every karmic imprint into something useful, beneficial and wholesome, right now.

It begins by taking ownership of the moment, and the sequence of moments that led up to this one (which, by the way, no longer exists, because the moment you read the words “this moment”, that moment is past, and no longer exists!)

We take ownership and let them go. Life has progressed, and so have we. Yesterday I reflected that life only requests that we make measurable progress in a reasonable amount of time. Accept that whatever has occurred in your past is the measurable progress you were meant to make in the past. Chart a new course today.

If that means moving beyond toxic relationships, do it. If it means discovering the ability to heal toxic relationships, do it. If it means forging new relationships, do it. If we threw babies out with the bathwater, we’d have to spend untold millions of dollars to repair the sewage lines, and clean up the environmental damage that would result. Imagine how much worse the damage was if we did that with grown ups! (Yes, I am the most warped dharma teacher on the planet… deal with it!)

Wanting to change all the circumstances in our lives to meet our expectations is commonplace, but not very useful. More useful is recognising that we cannot change circumstances, conditions and events… and we cannot change people… but we can always choose how we respond.

When we recognise that all phenomena are impermanent, then there is nothing that can cause suffering, except our decision to make it so. Yes, some things will cause pain… some might even cause extreme pain… but unless we try to avoid the pain… to shut it off… we will not suffer. True, some things will cause us to feel satisfied, and we might imagine those moments of satisfaction are “love”, “happiness”, “belonging” and “joy”… but unless we are mindful of the fact that those things are conditional phenomena, and impermanent, we will become attached, and the moment they end (as do all phenomena), we will suffer.

Bring your awareness to the moment. Right now, notice whatever is going on, and be grateful for it.

If something difficult is happening, it obviously hasn’t killed you, or you wouldn’t be wasting your time reading this! Therefore, it has made you stronger. Be grateful for that, and then say to yourself, “I now let go of those things and experiences, whose lessons I have already learned.” If you’re done with whatever it is, truly done with it, it will no longer effect you. If it’s still part of your experience, it will no longer cause you to suffer, because you will have embraced it with gratitude, and will be more aware of whatever it might be you are supposed to learn.

If something wonderful is happening, be grateful for that too. Let the gratitude be in the moment, as if there will never be another moment. That way, when the wonderful thing has passed, you will not suffer, because you will have acknowledged that it was a gift of that particular moment. Have you ever had someone give you a cold glass of iced tea on a hot, summer day? Wasn’t it wonderful? Did you save it? Of course not! If you had, it would have had no value!! You enjoyed it in the moment, and when it was done, it was done. I’ll bet no one reading this right now woke up this morning and cried because the glass of iced tea they had last summer was gone. (And if you did, there are mental health counselors listed in your local telephone directory, whom I encourage you to call immediately!)

Move on with your life, but not by worrying about the future… be fully present in the moment, and the rest will take care of itself.

Namast

Tonglen and the Path to Healing

Filed under:Dharma talks — posted by Dharmacharya Gurudas Sunyatananda on @ 1:59 am

Several people have asked me to elaborate more on what I meant by the word “tonglen”, in my request for students of the Dharma of Compassion, and all those who are sincerely interested in healing the violence and oppression in Tibet to join us each night for a minimum of one hour of undistracted sitting.

Tonglen literally means “giving and taking,” and is a spiritual, mind-training exercise, in which one mentally gives up one’s peace, in exchange for the suffering of another. It is not that we imagine that we literally possess the ability to do so, but the practice directs the mind toward healing, and generates genuine compassion. From the cultivation of this genuine compassion, one learns to generate the “Mind of Enlightenment”, Bodhicitta.

Ani Pema Chodron teaches that doing Tonglen “sweeps away the dust that has been covering over your treasure that’s always been there,” — we call this the Bodhicitta Heart. In the Eight Verses of Mind Training (Lojong), we are told to practice tonglen by “secretly taking on the suffering of others”. One does not announce to the person for whom they are engaging this practice that they will be taking on their suffering.

Tonglen can be practiced any time you perceive that a negative situation has arisen. Breathing in, you imagine yourself taking in the negativity, and breathing out, you send forth love-kindness, peace, calm and joy. The practice of Tonglen actually neutralises the dualistic tendencies of the mind, by refocusing on the true nature, which is Compassion.

When one commits to practicing tonglen, one moves beyond the self-absorption that lives in a sea of excuses, and imagines that there are more important things to do. One moves beyond fear and suspicion of others, and in fact, moves beyond the illusion of “otherness”.

I always openly share most of the dharma talks that I give to my students and fellow-monks with readers of my blogs, because I am mindful that we are all seeking happiness and freedom from suffering. As a spiritual leader, I might specify a particular aspect of practice, or instruct my monks to engage in that practice at a particular time of day, as I did in my recent post. It is important for them to do so, because of the structure, continuity and unity of the monastic satsang (sangha). But for readers, it should always be understood that if you feel comfortable enjoining your practice to ours, you would do so in the context and within the confines of your own circumstances and lifestyle.

In 1992, I was living at a monastic house in West Palm Beach, Florida, and working as a chaplain at a hospice, about an hour north of there. One of the other chaplains with whom I worked lived a few blocks from me, and at the beginning of the day, we would often have a staff meeting with the social workers, nurses and coordinator, to discuss the cases we were following that day.

Tibet and the Practice of Tonglen

Filed under:Dharma talks — posted by Dharmacharya Gurudas Sunyatananda on Sunday, 23rd March 2008 @ 11:21 pm

Not having been a particular fan of Speaker of the House, Nancy “oooh-no-we-must-not-impeach-the-terrorist” Pelosi, I do respect her decision (regardless of possible personal or political agenda) to stand with His Holiness, the XIV Dalai Lama, in opposition to the crimes against humanity the Chinese government continues to inflict upon the Tibetan people.

Saying that if people don’t speak out against China’s oppression in Tibet, “we have lost all moral authority to speak on behalf of human rights anywhere in the world,” did bolster my respect for her considerably, despite my disappointment that she will not take the same kind of decisive stance against the Mastermind of the 9/11 False Flag Operation.

I found myself, earlier today, saying how reprehensible I found it that the U.S. has not followed the courageous leadership of Thailand, where six torchbearers withdrew in protest, to send a clear message to China that the global community does not accept its actions. How could we allow the torch to come through San Francisco?

This afternoon, during a Dharma Talk, I read an excerpt from a 1996 address, by His Holiness, on the plight of the Tibetan people:

“Violations of human rights in Tibet have a distinct character. Such abuses are aimed at Tibetans as a people from asserting their own identity and their wish to preserve it. Thus, human rights violations in Tibet are often the result of institutionalised racial and cultural discrimination.”

That’s when it hit me, and I understood why it doesn’t come natural for the United States to rise to the occasion and withdraw its torchbearers from the ceremony, and its athletes from the Olympics altogether…

For generations, that same institutionalised racial and cultural discrimination and oppression has been leveled against persons of colour, women, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered persons, Muslims, Mormons, Pagans, 9/11 Truth Whistleblowers, and Atheists in the United States.

In order for beneficial effects to come about in the world, we must generate immense compassion for others, and cherish the rights of those we perceive as being “other” far more than we cherish ourselves. We call this generating true bodhicitta. At times of conflict, as nations witness the violence against other beings, we become mentally disturbed. We should preserve our awareness of the peace that begins within, and disarm ourselves interiorly, as His Holiness teaches, so that our awareness can bring about the good heart in others.

Every night, from 8 PM until 9 PM local time, I invite you to turn off your lights, your computer, your television, and spend one hour imagining that you can exchange your peace and calm for the suffering of those in China and Tibet. Picture it as though it was an easily accomplished possibility, and then feel the fire of compassion in your heart become a blaze, which burns off the suffering you received from them in exchange for your peace. And as that suffering burns, feel a warmth spread in your heart and throughout your entire body, filling you with greater compassion — real love — than you’ve ever dreamed possible. Breathe in and feel the compassion grow. Breathe out and allow that warmth to spread to your room, your home, your city, your state, your country and to the world.

This practice will require a sacrifice of time and discipline, but I literally beg you to consider doing so. That you and all sentient beings might be freed of all suffering, and endless lifetimes of birth, death and rebirth.

Om. Shanti, shanti, shanti!

~ gurudas sunyatananda, o.c.

On Empty Tombs…

Filed under:Dharma talks — posted by Dharmacharya Gurudas Sunyatananda on @ 2:29 am

True compassion and love are beginningless, and really defy our ability to completely describe, explain or quantify them. For me, this is what I call “the Ground of Being”. Often, we imagine our emotional attachments as being “love”, and while true love may actually be present in that relationship, it is usually buried beneath the baggage of what we think love is — sexual attraction, desire, emotional attraction, neediness, co-dependence, possessiveness, and so forth.

For the sake of clarity, whenever I write of this Ground of Being, I use upper-case letters, and do so with its equivalent “Love”.

Now I don’t embrace the belief that Love is a person, and don’t believe that Love created the universe. In fact, I don’t ascribe any kind of faith toward that Love at all. I don’t try to explain it, define it, quantify it or contain it. And one reason for that is simply that I don’t believe it’s necessary to do so, because for me, Love is all there is.

There is an ancient story celebrated today by many people of different backgrounds and faiths. On this day, the story tells us that the tomb was found to be empty…

Love is not only beginningless, it’s also endless. And so it makes sense that if Love were to have become incarnate, it would live on — beyond the appearances and illusions of this phenomenal world.

In the twelfth century, a Muslim holy man, named al-Ghazali, wrote a book entitled, Revival of the Religious Science, in which many of the sayings of Yeshua the Nazarene (Jesus) are contained; among them:

“Store up for yourselves something which the fire will not devour… Compassion.” (Ch. 3:178)

As a few members of our intentional community, which decided tonight to call itself the Lojong Monastery Project, gathered here for our liturgical celebration just before Midnight, on Saturday night, we began with a traditional blessing of the sacred fires, distribution of the blessed oils and incense, and then, with the sacred space lit by the fire of a single butter lamp, we read the words of several of the various resurrection mythos.

I intentionally prepared no dharma talk in advance for this night, and sat with my students for a few minutes, in complete silence, contemplating the words of the various Christian, Persian, Egyptian, Greek and Syrian resurrection narratives, all of which were said to have occurred on this particular morning.

I could not help but think about something Ramakrsna wrote, as I thought about the imagery of that empty tomb:

“He who finds not the Eternal in himself will never find it outside himself, but for the one who sees the Eternal in the temple of his own soul, the Eternal can be found also in the temple of the universe.”

I went a bit crazy, trying to find the exact passage in the books that line the wall of the chapel, and in the end, decided that we’d settle for my paraphrased interpretation of the passage.

It struck me that for so many years, the emphasis of the resurrection narrative has been placed on where the embodiment of Incarnate Love or Light was not… rather than being seen as a teaching on where “he” was.

The tomb would always be found empty, because one cannot bury Love. Love never dies, because it is not a phenomenon. Love exists as part of the numenal world.

What’s more, the lesson for us on this sacred morning is that we will never find the Incarnate Love by looking outside of ourselves, because that Love is not in a tomb… but in the temple of the Still, Small, Silence of our Hearts. Only when we recognise that, can we see with the eyes of enlightenment. Because then, Emptiness fills every space, and we recognise that Emptiness (sunyata in Sanskrit) is the Sacred Love that has incarnated itself in Avilokitesvara, in Krsna, in Christ, in Kuan Yin, in Diana/Venus, Mithra and in you and me.

Suddenly, we see with minds that are awakened and hearts that are filled. We experience what is called the Christ Consciousness or the Buddha Mind, and the cloud of unknowing dissolves as morning breaks, and clear light embraces us and we embrace it.

Less than an hour and a half ago, men and women from diverse spiritual paths — Catholic, Protestant, Pagan, Buddhist, Taoist and Atheist came together to celebrate real Eucharist — a meal of bread and wine, shared with mindfulness, compassion and loving-kindness. Master Thich Nhat Hanh tells that “[T]o eat a piece of bread or bowl of rice mindfully, and see that every morsel is a gift of the whole universe is to live deeply… When mindfulness is present, the Buddha and the Holy Spirit are already there.” (Living Buddha, Living Christ)

As we closed our celebration, I was reminded of something else Thich Nhat Hanh said in that book…

“When you are truly a happy Christian, you are also a Buddhist, and vice versa.”

The Fire of Practice

Filed under:Dharma talks — posted by Dharmacharya Gurudas Sunyatananda on Wednesday, 19th March 2008 @ 2:50 am

Buddha Sakyamuni is said to have taught,

Heart Thoughts® — 18 March 2008

Filed under:Dharma talks — posted by Dharmacharya Gurudas Sunyatananda on Tuesday, 18th March 2008 @ 4:34 am

“I live my life in growing orbits, which move out over the things of the world,” wrote Rainer Maria Rilke, “And I have been circling for a thousand years, and still I don’t know if I’m a falcon, or a storm, or a great song.”

Our process of spirituality is a journey of awakening… awakening to the truths, to the means of integrating those truths into our lives… and letting go of all that causes suffering or grasping.

Whether our awakening comes gradually, like the first light of the new day; or suddenly, as when a bolt of lightening illuminates the midnight sky, this awakening brings us deeper into the sacred silence, the unknowing, the perfect love and finally into the clear light of sunyata… Emptiness.

The mystic, John of the Cross said the same thing, in different words, “Deep in the wine vault of my love I drink, and when I came out on this open meadow, I knew nothing at all…”

Namast

On doing no harm…

Filed under:Dharma talks — posted by Dharmacharya Gurudas Sunyatananda on Monday, 17th March 2008 @ 2:02 am

Someone just emailed me to ask why I don’t expose those teachers, gurus and spiritual “leaders” I have encountered, whom I believe to be manipulative, unskilled and destructive, by naming names.

My response is simply to ask what good would arise from doing so?

If I expose someone whose teaching is becoming more and more ego-centric and absurd the older they get, I am causing them pain, as well as harming those who still think highly of that person. If someone still trusts them and is benefiting in some way from their teaching, they are experiencing satisfaction, if only temporary. Exposing the teacher would not make them a better teacher, but might cause them to become more bitter, more manipulative and more self-destructive.

I would rather spend every day in gratitude for the lessons learned from that teacher, and all teachers, realising that at one time, every sentient being could have been my mother… and at some time in the future, those who have not yet been might still become my mother. My responsibility is to inspire compassion, non-fear, altruistic joy, loving-kindness and equanimity in others, so as to aid in the cessation of suffering.

Sometimes I will use humour or sarcasm to “short-circuit” someone’s preoccupation with negativity, but I choose consciously not to do harm to them or anyone else.

Even when we discover someone caught up in an unwholesome pursuit, we will do more for them by being compassionate than we could ever do by being mean or harmful.

Have I not done things in my past that could be called manipulative, harmful, dishonest or hurtful as well? Has my ego not driven me to do things for recognition, fame, power, or pleasure in the past also? Then why would I feel qualified to stand in judgment of someone else suffering those same delusions?

I would welcome such persons to sit with me upon the dais, and join me for tea, that I might learn from them and discover the source of their own suffering. I would ask the opportunity to be able to do something meaningful to end their suffering, and bring them true joy.

One teacher sent her “students” to the house of one of my sisters, to try and coerce her at gunpoint to come live with them at their newly formed ashram. They harassed her and her friends, offered drugs and became forceful, until a retired law enforcement officer came to her aid and ran them off. If I were to expose her now, thirty years later, how would that alleviate my sister’s suffering, or the mental instability and suffering of that teacher or students who were foolish enough to follow such ridiculous orders? Instead, seventeen years after the incident, I sat at her feet and learned the way to serve others from her.

Did she change? That’s not for me to decide. We all change every day of our lives. I am confident that she did as well. But until we let go of the “us vs. them” mentality, which is the dualistic mind of the ego, we will never recognise that every being is a teacher, and every being deserves compassion. When we do that, the transformation and healing that occurs can be unimaginable.

This is called doing no harm. It is our way.

Namast

Passion Sunday — A Buddhist Perspective

Filed under:Dharma talks — posted by Dharmacharya Gurudas Sunyatananda on Sunday, 16th March 2008 @ 12:32 am

It may be tempting for those of us who do not subscribe to the tenets and doctrines of Christianity to dismiss the entire message and meaning of Lent, and especially what might seem to be a misguided and superstitious belief that the plagiarised Passion Story refers to an historic event in the life of the Great and Anointed Essene Rabbi. Even more tempting, for those of us who do not believe in a God or gods, might be the notion that there is nothing in the mythos for us, even as sacred mythology, because we have no use for theistic or deist notions.

In either case, we could be missing an opportunity for personal growth.

Today, Christendom observes the start of Holy Week — an annual commemoration of the mythos of the suffering, death and resurrection of the Egyptian Sun God, as applied to the life of Jesus the Nazarene. The story was likely adopted within the first hundred years after the historic Teacher’s real death, as part of a midrashic attempt to frame His powerful teachings on compassion, loving-kindness, altruistic joy, service to those in need, and equanimity, in a familiar cultural hero’s epic.

Holy Week begins with Palm Sunday (or Passion Sunday), on which the culmination of the Great Epic is retold. The story recounts the triumphal return of Jesus to the Holy City of Jerusalem, his subsequent betrayal, arrest, torture and murder. It can be a theme that is lost on many followers of the Christian sects, because it seems to be a recounting of the “worst part of the story”, which makes them yearn for the “victory” of Easter Sunday. I also suspect that having missed the point of the mythos entirely, it is one of the likely reasons so many of the institutional Christians fell into the error of believing the resurrection legend to be literally true. After all, if you literally believed that the Passion Story were an account of the historic torture of your Beloved, it would only follow that you wanted a “happy ending to the story”, just like every other fairy tale.

I was always moved by the compassion, mercy and trust the Passion Story portrays in Jesus and His Mother. Most of us have known betrayal in our lives. And so we can readily appreciate that betrayal is painful. We mourn the loss or misplaced trust we had in someone, and I am sure the idea of the “agony in the garden” is to portray Jesus as having suffered those painful emotions as well. But what always struck me was that I sensed it was not his own feeling of betrayal that wounded Jesus, so much as it was the sympathetic pain he felt for those who were doing the betraying. It seemed to me that He understood Judas’ struggle, Peter’s lack of courage, the fear and terror his discples must have felt, according to the mythos.

Peter’s denial was not one of Jesus, but of Christ… not about not knowing a man, but rather a denial of understanding his own Ground of Being. He was denying all he has been taught, and must have suffered realising his tragic lack of courage.

Judas suffered too, not because he betrayed his master, but because, according to the canonical legend, he refused to acknowledge the great truth Jesus had taught them — that the mythical terroristic god of the Jews was just that… a legend for a primitive people. The “real” nature of the Absolute, Jesus revealed, was compassion. “God is Love,” he taught, and therefore, that “God” would be forgiveness… a forgiveness Judas couldn’t bring himself to imagine possible for him.

The point of transformation in one’s life does not come from the act of penance and reforming one’s life, as the institutional church often teaches… it comes from the enlightened mind letting go of the attachments to those wrongs, and accepting the grace of forgiveness.

Love is stronger than any pain we might experience — even torture and death. There was a Tibetan monk, who at the time of China’s illegal occupation of that country, was brought before a firing squad. As he kneeled there, ready to be executed, he prayed, “Let me accept all of the karma, suffering and lifetimes of pain each of my persecuters will experience as a result of their actions, so that they might experience my peace and happiness.”

In Buddhism, we call this the practice of tonglen. And while it might not literally be possible to take on the karma of another, it is what the legend of Jesus is all about… loving all of creation enough to be willing to take on their suffering, so that they might have the peace He knew, as a Bodhisattva… and Enlightened Master.

And so, our community satsang will celebrate the sacred liturgy of the Passion tonight at Midnight, and upon the altar will be placed symbolic representations of the palm fronds and olive branches, often exchanged throughout Christendom on this day. (The Orthodox use pussywillows, and I just couldn’t ever bring myself to do that, so we’re going to stick with the Western traditions!) We will commemorate the meaning of the legend, and more importantly, the great contributions of the historic Master, who brought the Dharma of Compassion to his people in a way that was relevant, healing and transformative.

We pray that one day, we might have the enlightenment ourselves to be able to do that for our time and culture as well.

This is especially a time when I celebrate the gift of my Christian friends, because it is, as Thich Nhat Hanh reminds us, not only true that Christians need Jesus, but also that Jesus needs them, for it is through them that the energy of Christ becomes manifest in the modern world.

So too is it true that we not only need Buddha, our source of refuge, but that Buddha needs us, because the purpose of our practice is not to worship Buddha and make Buddhists, but to serve others and make Buddhas of ourselves and all sentient beings.

Peace and all Blessings!

– Gurudas Sunyatananda, O.C.
The Monastic Order of Compassion
http://spiritusproject.org


next page


image: detail of installation by Bronwyn Lace